Arulananthu, vs Rayappan, — 3/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7rule1. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG160000392019
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
3/2017
Filing Date
03-01-2017
Registration No
3/2017
Registration Date
03-01-2017
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Vedasandur
Judge
3-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arulananthu,
Rajasekar,
Arokiyadas,
Velankanni,
Penchamin and others
Adv. Thiru.V.Rathinam
Rajasekar
Aroickiadass
Velankanni
Benjamin pris
Yagoop
Sesuraj
Francis
Vincent
Respondent(s)
Rayappan,
Jacob robert,
Xavior,
Anthonydos,
Dist Collector,
Tahsildar, Vdr and others Advocate - Thiru.B.Ganesan
Jokkapraboort
Xavier
Antonydass
District Collector
The Tahsildar
Regina Mary
Arul Julia Mary
William Amalanathan
Martin
Amali
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Principal District Munsif
Part Heard
List / Special List
Amendment
Amendment
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | List / Special List |
| 05-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 17-02-2026 | Amendment |
| 12-01-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: This is a witness examination record in civil case 3/2017 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Vedasandur. The witness Arulanandu (aged 63) was examined on 10.04.2026 under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, and his examination-in-chief was completed. Cross-examination has been adjourned as per the request of the opposing counsel, with six documentary exhibits admitted including a survey map, plan, register extract, computer data, electricity receipt, and 16 photographs of property structures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: This is a witness examination record in civil case 3/2017 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Vedasandur. The witness Arulanandu (aged 63) was examined on 10.04.2026 under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, and his examination-in-chief was completed. Cross-examination has been adjourned as per the request of the opposing counsel, with six documentary exhibits admitted including a survey map, plan, register extract, computer data, electricity receipt, and 16 photographs of property structures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts