Janagaran vs Murugan — 101/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142(b). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 21st April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNDG130002362026
Filing Number
236/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
101/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Oddanchatram
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Janagaran
Respondent(s)
-
1.Murugan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate of Oddanchatram allowed Shriram Finance Ltd.'s petition to condone a 94-day delay in filing a cheque bounce complaint under Section 142(b) of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court found the delay was not willful but occurred due to misplacement of original documents with arbitration bundles, and accepted that condonation was necessary in the interest of justice to prevent the case from being dismissed on technicalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Apr-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Apr-2026
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 101/2026
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate of Oddanchatram allowed Shriram Finance Ltd.'s petition to condone a 94-day delay in filing a cheque bounce complaint under Section 142(b) of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court found the delay was not willful but occurred due to misplacement of original documents with arbitration bundles, and accepted that condonation was necessary in the interest of justice to prevent the case from being dismissed on technicalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts