Janagaran vs Manimegalai — 100/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142(b). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNDG130002352026

Filing Number

235/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

100/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Oddanchatram

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Janagaran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manimegalai

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate at Oddanchatram allowed Shriram Finance Ltd.'s petition to condone a 17-day delay in filing a cheque dishonor complaint against Manimegalai under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court accepted that the delay was caused by the petitioner's ill-health preventing timely consultation with counsel and was not willful or deliberate. Applying a liberal, justice-oriented approach, the court ruled that the minimal delay should not scuttle the case on technical grounds alone, thereby permitting the complaint to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate at Oddanchatram allowed Shriram Finance Ltd.'s petition to condone a 17-day delay in filing a cheque dishonor complaint against Manimegalai under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court accepted that the delay was caused by the petitioner's ill-health preventing timely consultation with counsel and was not willful or deliberate. Applying a liberal, justice-oriented approach, the court ruled that the minimal delay should not scuttle the case on technical grounds alone, thereby permitting the complaint to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case