Thandikudi Police Station vs Vanaraj — 60/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326, 294(b), 323. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNDG110003992022

Filing Number

343/2022

Filing Date

13-Jul-2022

Registration No

60/2022

Registration Date

25-Aug-2022

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I Court, Kodaikanal

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 326, 294(b), 323

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thandikudi Police Station

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vanaraj

  2. 2.A

  3. 3.Sathis kumar

  4. 4.A

  5. 5.Kulaithivel

  6. 6.A

  7. 7.Mutharasan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Case CC 60/2022 The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Kodaikanal acquitted all four accused (Vanaraj, Sathishkumar, Kulanthaivel, and Mutharasan) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, and 326, finding insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the complainant/key witness (PW1) turned hostile, contradicting the prosecution's allegations of obscene language, criminal force, and grievous hurt, and no corroborating evidence or weapon recovery substantiated the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  4. 25-May-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  5. 22-May-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  6. 22-May-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  7. 22-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  8. 18-May-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  11. 16-Feb-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  13. 15-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  14. 03-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  15. 15-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  16. 11-Aug-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  17. 28-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  18. 17-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  19. 29-May-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  20. 15-May-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  21. 08-Apr-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  22. 24-Feb-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  23. 10-Feb-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  24. 19-Dec-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  25. 19-Nov-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  26. 30-Sep-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  27. 19-Aug-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  28. 19-Jul-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  29. 11-Jun-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  30. 13-May-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  31. 22-Apr-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  32. 11-Mar-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  33. 29-Jan-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  34. 18-Dec-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  35. 21-Nov-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  36. 10-Oct-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  37. 19-Sep-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  38. 18-Sep-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  39. 08-Aug-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  40. 10-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  41. 13-Jun-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  42. 05-May-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  43. 06-Apr-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  44. 07-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  45. 24-Jan-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  46. 15-Dec-2022

    Appearance

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  47. 15-Nov-2022

    Appearance

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  48. 15-Oct-2022

    Appearance

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  49. 29-Sep-2022

    Appearance

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  50. 25-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 13-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case CC 60/2022 The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Kodaikanal acquitted all four accused (Vanaraj, Sathishkumar, Kulanthaivel, and Mutharasan) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, and 326, finding insufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the complainant/key witness (PW1) turned hostile, contradicting the prosecution's allegations of obscene language, criminal force, and grievous hurt, and no corroborating evidence or weapon recovery substantiated the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case