Leelavadhi vs Muthulakshmi — 52/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG110003132022
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
54/2022
Filing Date
05-07-2022
Registration No
52/2022
Registration Date
05-07-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I Court, Kodaikanal
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Leelavadhi
Adv. R.Pitchai
Jeyamurugan
Roajarani
Thamarai Selvi
Raja
Rajalakshmi
Krishnan
Respondent(s)
Muthulakshmi
Dhanapaul
Gowsalya
Block Development Officer
The District Collector
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Steps
Steps
Steps
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Steps |
| 12-03-2026 | Steps |
| 27-01-2026 | Steps |
| 18-12-2025 | Trial |
| 25-11-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed - The District Civil and Criminal Court (Judge No. 1) at Kodalkanal granted an interim injunction petition filed by seven petitioners against three respondents. The court ordered that the respondents and their agents/associates are prohibited from trespassing, constructing, or interfering with a 3-foot-wide pathway on the petitioners' property in Vilpatti Village. However, the court dismissed the petition regarding the cattle path, noting that the core disputed issues (pathway ownership and usage rights) require examination of witnesses and evidence in the original suit before final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed - The District Civil and Criminal Court (Judge No. 1) at Kodalkanal granted an interim injunction petition filed by seven petitioners against three respondents. The court ordered that the respondents and their agents/associates are prohibited from trespassing, constructing, or interfering with a 3-foot-wide pathway on the petitioners' property in Vilpatti Village. However, the court dismissed the petition regarding the cattle path, noting that the core disputed issues (pathway ownership and usage rights) require examination of witnesses and evidence in the original suit before final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts