Shantha sorubana and other vs Santha Suresh and others Advocate - D1 Ramesh, D2 Mohameed mydeen — 49/2013
Case under Cottoncopraandvegetableoilscess(abolition)act Section OrderVIIrule1ofCPC. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG110000692013
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Date
28-02-2013
Registration No
49/2013
Registration Date
28-02-2013
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I Court, Kodaikanal
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shantha sorubana and other
Adv. Janakiraman
Respondent(s)
Santha Suresh and others Advocate - D1 Ramesh, D2 Mohameed mydeen
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 27-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 22-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed (Partially) The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate allowed the 2nd Defendant's petition to reject the plaint for insufficient court fee, but instead of outright rejection, directed the Plaintiffs to revalue the suit within 15 days under Section 25(b) of the Tamil Nadu Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1955 and pay the correct court fee. The court found that seeking declaration of title with consequential injunction requires valuation based on market value of the property, not nominal valuation under Section 25(d). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed (Partially) The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate allowed the 2nd Defendant's petition to reject the plaint for insufficient court fee, but instead of outright rejection, directed the Plaintiffs to revalue the suit within 15 days under Section 25(b) of the Tamil Nadu Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1955 and pay the correct court fee. The court found that seeking declaration of title with consequential injunction requires valuation based on market value of the property, not nominal valuation under Section 25(d). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts