Raj vs Pal Pandi — 2/2026

Summary: The petition for temporary injunction (IA No. 2/2026) filed by the petitioners against the respondents regarding a 40-acre property in Kodaikanal has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case of possessory rights, as both parties' claims are seriously disputed and clouded by conflicting revenue authority proceedings. The court ruled that determining possessory rights at the interlocutory stage would amount to deciding the merits of the main suit prematurely, and accordingly ordered the parties to proceed to full trial where evidence can be presented and adjudicated on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.