Raj vs Pal Pandi — 2/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR 7 R 1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Trial Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG110000192026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I Court, Kodaikanal

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR 7 R 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raj

    Adv. S. MUTHU KANNAN

  2. 2.Vasagan

  3. 3.Chinna Kalai

  4. 4.Palani Sami

  5. 5.Chandra

  6. 6.Pari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pal Pandi

  2. 2.Mookaiah

  3. 3.Kannuchamy

  4. 4.Ganeshan

  5. 5.Panja Raj

  6. 6.Pugal Pandi

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition for temporary injunction (IA No. 2/2026) filed by the petitioners against the respondents regarding a 40-acre property in Kodaikanal has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case of possessory rights, as both parties' claims are seriously disputed and clouded by conflicting revenue authority proceedings. The court ruled that determining possessory rights at the interlocutory stage would amount to deciding the merits of the main suit prematurely, and accordingly ordered the parties to proceed to full trial where evidence can be presented and adjudicated on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition for temporary injunction (IA No. 2/2026) filed by the petitioners against the respondents regarding a 40-acre property in Kodaikanal has been dismissed. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case of possessory rights, as both parties' claims are seriously disputed and clouded by conflicting revenue authority proceedings. The court ruled that determining possessory rights at the interlocutory stage would amount to deciding the merits of the main suit prematurely, and accordingly ordered the parties to proceed to full trial where evidence can be presented and adjudicated on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case