THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM PS vs ILAIYARAJA — 211/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,125(b). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 28th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG100024912025
e-Filing Number
17-11-2025
Filing Number
2424/2025
Filing Date
20-11-2025
Registration No
211/2025
Registration Date
03-12-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
624
Police Station
natham police station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM PS (Police Station)
Adv. Sub Inspector of Police NathamPS
Respondent(s)
ILAIYARAJA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 18-04-2026 | Questioning |
| 17-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 09-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary Court: District Criminal Court, Nattam, Tamil Nadu Judgment Date: April 28, 2026 The court acquitted the defendant of charges under Sections 281 and 125(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) in a motor vehicle accident case, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted inconsistencies in witness testimonies and determined that evidence did not conclusively establish the defendant drove recklessly or caused the injuries to the two complainants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Judgment Summary Court: District Criminal Court, Nattam, Tamil Nadu Judgment Date: April 28, 2026 The court acquitted the defendant of charges under Sections 281 and 125(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) in a motor vehicle accident case, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted inconsistencies in witness testimonies and determined that evidence did not conclusively establish the defendant drove recklessly or caused the injuries to the two complainants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts