THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM PS vs ANDICHAMY — 27/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),351(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNDG100024902025

e-Filing Number

15-11-2025

Filing Number

2423/2025

Filing Date

20-Nov-2025

Registration No

27/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

300

Police Station

natham police station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),351(2)
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM PS (Police Station)

    Adv. Sub Inspector of Police NathamPS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANDICHAMY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Judgment Summary The court acquitted all seven accused of charges under BNS Sections 296(b), 351(2), and the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Atrocities Act Section 4, finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant alleged the accused harassed and threatened him regarding unpaid money from a defunct PACL company investment, but the court found critical evidentiary gaps—including the complainant's death by suicide, deceased key witness, and contradictory witness testimonies—rendering the case unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  8. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  9. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  10. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  12. 03-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  13. 19-Feb-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  14. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 20-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary The court acquitted all seven accused of charges under BNS Sections 296(b), 351(2), and the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Atrocities Act Section 4, finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant alleged the accused harassed and threatened him regarding unpaid money from a defunct PACL company investment, but the court found critical evidentiary gaps—including the complainant's death by suicide, deceased key witness, and contradictory witness testimonies—rendering the case unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case