THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM PS vs BALAJI — 196/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,106(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG100023422025
e-Filing Number
24-10-2025
Filing Number
2282/2025
Filing Date
25-10-2025
Registration No
196/2025
Registration Date
27-10-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
454
Police Station
natham police station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
BALAJI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 08-04-2026 | Questioning |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The district criminal court acquitted the accused of charges under Sections 281 and 106(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or caused a fatal road accident. The court determined that while a death occurred from a collision involving the accused's vehicle, the evidence—particularly witness testimonies—created sufficient doubt about the accused's culpability, warranting acquittal under the benefit of doubt principle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Judgment Summary The district criminal court acquitted the accused of charges under Sections 281 and 106(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or caused a fatal road accident. The court determined that while a death occurred from a collision involving the accused's vehicle, the evidence—particularly witness testimonies—created sufficient doubt about the accused's culpability, warranting acquittal under the benefit of doubt principle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts