THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM PS vs BALAJI — 196/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,106(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNDG100023422025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

24-10-2025

Filing Number

2282/2025

Filing Date

25-10-2025

Registration No

196/2025

Registration Date

27-10-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

454

Police Station

natham police station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,106(1)

Petitioner(s)

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

BALAJI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

18-04-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

Judgement

08-04-2026

Questioning

27-03-2026

Evidence

24-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Judgment Summary The district criminal court acquitted the accused of charges under Sections 281 and 106(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or caused a fatal road accident. The court determined that while a death occurred from a collision involving the accused's vehicle, the evidence—particularly witness testimonies—created sufficient doubt about the accused's culpability, warranting acquittal under the benefit of doubt principle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary The district criminal court acquitted the accused of charges under Sections 281 and 106(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or caused a fatal road accident. The court determined that while a death occurred from a collision involving the accused's vehicle, the evidence—particularly witness testimonies—created sufficient doubt about the accused's culpability, warranting acquittal under the benefit of doubt principle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case