A Soorandi vs T Chinnasamy and C Lakshmi — 953/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 25th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNDG100012832025
e-Filing Number
07-06-2025
Filing Number
1246/2025
Filing Date
18-06-2025
Registration No
953/2025
Registration Date
18-06-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
Police Station
natham police station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A Soorandi
Adv. Deepak R
Respondent(s)
T Chinnasamy and C Lakshmi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 25-02-2026 | Orders |
| 04-02-2026 | Orders |
| 22-01-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Munsif Court dismissed the private criminal complaint filed by A. Soorandi against T. Chinnasamy and C. Lakshmi for alleged criminal trespass, theft, and harassment regarding disputed property. The court held that the dispute fundamentally concerns civil property rights and boundaries, not criminal offences, as the accused claimed a bona fide right to the land based on prior partition—lacking the requisite criminal intent. The complainant was directed to pursue remedies through the appropriate Civil Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The District Munsif Court dismissed the private criminal complaint filed by A. Soorandi against T. Chinnasamy and C. Lakshmi for alleged criminal trespass, theft, and harassment regarding disputed property. The court held that the dispute fundamentally concerns civil property rights and boundaries, not criminal offences, as the accused claimed a bona fide right to the land based on prior partition—lacking the requisite criminal intent. The complainant was directed to pursue remedies through the appropriate Civil Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts