Sub Inspector Of Police, Natham PS vs Ashok — 54/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG100005852025
e-Filing Number
14-03-2025
Filing Number
565/2025
Filing Date
17-03-2025
Registration No
54/2025
Registration Date
21-04-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
499
Police Station
natham police station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector Of Police, Natham PS (Police Station)
Adv. Sub Inspector of Police NathamPS
Respondent(s)
Ashok
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Questioning
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 27-02-2026 | Questioning |
| 26-02-2026 | Questioning |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The DM cum JM Court in Nattam acquitted the accused under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused possessed and intended to sell the seized alcohol bottles. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish a clear nexus between the accused and the contraband, noting the absence of independent witnesses, proper chain of custody documentation, and corroborating evidence to support the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The DM cum JM Court in Nattam acquitted the accused under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused possessed and intended to sell the seized alcohol bottles. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish a clear nexus between the accused and the contraband, noting the absence of independent witnesses, proper chain of custody documentation, and corroborating evidence to support the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts