Si of Police vs Mathiyalagan — 48/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),127(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG100002782026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
259/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
48/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
49
Police Station
natham police station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Si of Police
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mathiyalagan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court acquitted the accused Mathiyazagan of charges under sections 296(b) and 127(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that key government witnesses, including the complainant, later reconciled with the accused and withdrew their support for the case, thereby undermining the prosecution's case and requiring the accused's acquittal under Section 278(1) of the BNSS Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2026
Questioning
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2026
Questioning
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 48/2026
The court acquitted the accused Mathiyazagan of charges under sections 296(b) and 127(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that key government witnesses, including the complainant, later reconciled with the accused and withdrew their support for the case, thereby undermining the prosecution's case and requiring the accused's acquittal under Section 278(1) of the BNSS Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts