Sathik Batcha vs Si of Police — 178/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNDG100002732026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

256/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

178/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

107

Police Station

natham police station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sathik Batcha

    Adv. DURGA DEVI M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Si of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The District Criminal Court at Natham rejected the accused's bail petition under Section 480 BNS. The court found that the charges under Sections 296(b), 309(6), and 351(3) BNS constitute cognizable offenses, and considering the pending theft case, risk of tampering with evidence, and the serious nature of the charges, bail was deemed inappropriate at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Await Reports

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 178/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District Criminal Court at Natham rejected the accused's bail petition under Section 480 BNS. The court found that the charges under Sections 296(b), 309(6), and 351(3) BNS constitute cognizable offenses, and considering the pending theft case, risk of tampering with evidence, and the serious nature of the charges, bail was deemed inappropriate at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case