Sarasu vs Si of Police — 102/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 268(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNDG100001692026

Filing Number

164/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

102/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 268(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sarasu

  2. 2.Saravanan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Si of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary The Nattam District Court dismissed a discharge petition filed by two accused persons (Sarasu and Saravanan) in a criminal case involving alleged dog poisoning. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence and "strong suspicion" that the accused committed the offense under IPC Section 429, holding that the investigating officer's final report and witness statements established adequate grounds to proceed with trial rather than discharge the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Counter

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Counter

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Counter

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Counter

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Nattam District Court dismissed a discharge petition filed by two accused persons (Sarasu and Saravanan) in a criminal case involving alleged dog poisoning. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence and "strong suspicion" that the accused committed the offense under IPC Section 429, holding that the investigating officer's final report and witness statements established adequate grounds to proceed with trial rather than discharge the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case