Chinnaponnu vs Ponnuchamy Alais Sathampadiyar — 10/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,326,506(1). Status: Issue of Process. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG100001532024
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
07-01-2024
Filing Number
150/2024
Filing Date
10-01-2024
Registration No
10/2024
Registration Date
18-01-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
246
Police Station
natham police station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chinnaponnu
Respondent(s)
Ponnuchamy Alais Sathampadiyar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Issue of Process
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | Issue of Process |
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No. CC.10/2024 | District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Natham This document records the depositions of four injured witnesses in a violent assault case dated February 12, 2025. The witnesses testified that accused Ponnusamy, while intoxicated, stabbed four victims (Santhanababu, Premkumar, Muthukkrishnan, and Adaikammali) with a knife on May 20, 2023, following a prior dispute. All witnesses identified the weapon used and confirmed the accused fled after threatening bystanders; no cross-examination was conducted by the defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No. CC.10/2024 | District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Natham This document records the depositions of four injured witnesses in a violent assault case dated February 12, 2025. The witnesses testified that accused Ponnusamy, while intoxicated, stabbed four victims (Santhanababu, Premkumar, Muthukkrishnan, and Adaikammali) with a knife on May 20, 2023, following a prior dispute. All witnesses identified the weapon used and confirmed the accused fled after threatening bystanders; no cross-examination was conducted by the defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts