SI of police vs Rasu and 6 others — 1/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),452,323,506(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG100000142023
Filing Number
13/2023
Filing Date
02-01-2023
Registration No
1/2023
Registration Date
02-01-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Natham
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
637
Police Station
natham police station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of police
Adv. A.P.P.Gr.1
Respondent(s)
Rasu and 6 others
Chellathurai
Nalliappan
Subramani
Ramasamy
Alagarsamy
Poonjolai
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Await Records
Judgement
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Await Records |
| 05-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 27-02-2026 | Questioning |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The District Sessions Court in Nattam acquitted all seven accused persons (charged under IPC sections 148, 294(b), 452, 323/324, and 506(i), read with Tamil Nadu Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act Section 4) due to insufficient evidence. While prosecution witnesses testified about alleged criminal intimidation and assault on September 9-10, 2019, the court found substantial contradictions in witness statements and gaps in evidence that created reasonable doubt, preventing proof beyond doubt as required by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Decision The District Sessions Court in Nattam acquitted all seven accused persons (charged under IPC sections 148, 294(b), 452, 323/324, and 506(i), read with Tamil Nadu Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act Section 4) due to insufficient evidence. While prosecution witnesses testified about alleged criminal intimidation and assault on September 9-10, 2019, the court found substantial contradictions in witness statements and gaps in evidence that created reasonable doubt, preventing proof beyond doubt as required by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts