The S.I of Police, Taluk PS vs Palanisamy and 5 others — 371/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),323,324,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG090068092022
Filing Number
6809/2022
Filing Date
09-12-2022
Registration No
371/2022
Registration Date
09-12-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palani
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
143
Police Station
Taluk P.S. Palani
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The S.I of Police, Taluk PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Palanisamy and 5 others
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 07-04-2026 | Questioning |
| 26-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 24-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This is a witness deposition document in Criminal Case No. 371 of 2022 before the Judicial Magistrate, Palani, recorded on 07.04.2026. The witness (a police investigator) testified that she filed the FIR based on the investigating officer's records regarding an incident on 10.05.2018 involving assault and injuries, and detailed the evidence collection process including medical reports and physical evidence (weapons) marked as exhibits. The defense contested the investigation procedure and witness credibility, but the court proceeded to examine seven listed witnesses and ultimately framed charges against the accused under IPC sections 294(b), 323, and 324 (simple hurt and criminal intimidation). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness deposition document in Criminal Case No. 371 of 2022 before the Judicial Magistrate, Palani, recorded on 07.04.2026. The witness (a police investigator) testified that she filed the FIR based on the investigating officer's records regarding an incident on 10.05.2018 involving assault and injuries, and detailed the evidence collection process including medical reports and physical evidence (weapons) marked as exhibits. The defense contested the investigation procedure and witness credibility, but the court proceeded to examine seven listed witnesses and ultimately framed charges against the accused under IPC sections 294(b), 323, and 324 (simple hurt and criminal intimidation). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts