Taluk PS vs Thangavel Advocate - K.Muruganantham — 297/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 03-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNDG090021822017

Filing Number

5000297/2017

Filing Date

15-Nov-2017

Registration No

297/2017

Registration Date

15-Nov-2017

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palani

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

82

Police Station

Taluk P.S. Palani

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Taluk PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thangavel Advocate - K.Muruganantham

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-May-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 10-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 07-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 17-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 04-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case No. C.C. 297 of 2017 The accused was absent from court proceedings. A petition filed under Section 317 Cr.P.C. (relating to the accused's absence) was allowed by the court on 04.07.2025. The order includes detailed cross-examination testimony of PW1 regarding a road accident incident involving a two-wheeler, discussing the circumstances, vehicle ownership, and compensation claims arising from the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 04-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 19-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 10-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 07-Jan-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 19-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 05-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 07-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 19-Sep-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 30-Apr-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 01-Feb-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 28-Nov-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 29-Aug-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 25-May-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 24-Feb-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 30-Nov-2022

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 17-Oct-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 17-Oct-2022

    Restored

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 17-Oct-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 04-Dec-2018

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 25-Oct-2018

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 17-Sep-2018

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 30-Jul-2018

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 11-Jun-2018

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 11-Apr-2018

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 21-Feb-2018

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  37. 25-Jan-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 15-Nov-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 297/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case No. C.C. 297 of 2017 The accused was absent from court proceedings. A petition filed under Section 317 Cr.P.C. (relating to the accused's absence) was allowed by the court on 04.07.2025. The order includes detailed cross-examination testimony of PW1 regarding a road accident incident involving a two-wheeler, discussing the circumstances, vehicle ownership, and compensation claims arising from the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case