Lakshmi vs Sivasubramanian — 21/2018
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 19(1)(F),19(2)(8),20,22. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
DVC - Domestic Violence Case
CNR: TNDG090021802018
Filing Number
3360021/2018
Filing Date
27-Jul-2018
Registration No
21/2018
Registration Date
27-Jul-2018
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Palani
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lakshmi
Adv. V.Rajamanickam
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sivasubramanian
Case History
-
10-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-May-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Dec-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Nov-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Oct-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jul-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Dec-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Oct-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Sep-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Aug-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jul-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-May-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Apr-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2023
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary - DVOP. 21/2018 This is a family court order from Pazhaiyur (Tamil Nadu) dated 24.03.2023 regarding a domestic violence petition. The court examined cross-examination testimony of the defendant (respondent), primarily addressing disputes over matrimonial property, dowry amount (26 sovereigns of gold), marital cohabitation (3-4 months), and the defendant's financial/health condition. The court found contradictions in the defendant's testimony regarding land ownership (claiming 20 acres versus 2.25 acres stated by petitioner) and noted the couple has lived separately for over 20 years with prior divorce proceedings (HMOP No.155/2015). The order appears to be an interim examination record rather than a final judgment, documenting testimony during the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2022
DepositionView PDF
-
16-Dec-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Nov-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Oct-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Sep-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Aug-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jul-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jul-2022
DepositionView PDF
-
08-Jul-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jun-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Apr-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Apr-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Dec-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jul-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Apr-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Mar-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Feb-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Nov-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Sep-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jul-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jan-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Nov-2019
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Oct-2019
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Oct-2019
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Sep-2019
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Sep-2019
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Aug-2019
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jul-2019
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jun-2019
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2019
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2019
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2019
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Dec-2018
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2018
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Oct-2018
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Sep-2018
Counter
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Aug-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jul-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 21/2018
Case Summary - DVOP. 21/2018 This is a family court order from Pazhaiyur (Tamil Nadu) dated 24.03.2023 regarding a domestic violence petition. The court examined cross-examination testimony of the defendant (respondent), primarily addressing disputes over matrimonial property, dowry amount (26 sovereigns of gold), marital cohabitation (3-4 months), and the defendant's financial/health condition. The court found contradictions in the defendant's testimony regarding land ownership (claiming 20 acres versus 2.25 acres stated by petitioner) and noted the couple has lived separately for over 20 years with prior divorce proceedings (HMOP No.155/2015). The order appears to be an interim examination record rather than a final judgment, documenting testimony during the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts