Cr.No.134/16, Keeranur P.S. vs Neenbar — 2499/2016

Case under --- Section 4(1)tnoppd. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNDG090020282016

Part Heard

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

2499/2016

Filing Date

18-10-2016

Registration No

2499/2016

Registration Date

18-10-2016

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palani

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate

FIR Details

FIR Number

134

Police Station

Keeranur P.S.

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

--- Section 4(1)tnoppd
INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 188

Petitioner(s)

Cr.No.134/16, Keeranur P.S.

Respondent(s)

Neenbar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate

14-05-2026

Part Heard

25-03-2026

Part Heard

12-03-2026

Part Heard

18-02-2026

Part Heard

28-01-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

21-03-2022
Deposition
07-06-2023
Deposition
18-07-2023
Deposition

Summary: This is a witness deposition (P.W.2) recorded on 18.07.2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Palani in case S.T.C. 2499 of 2016. The witness testified regarding an alleged Tamilar symbol drawn on a school wall during the 2016 elections, stating he did not directly know who drew it and could not confirm details about the accused's involvement. During cross-examination, the witness acknowledged that while a symbol was present on the wall, the accused's name was not specifically mentioned, and his testimony does not establish the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a witness deposition (P.W.2) recorded on 18.07.2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Palani in case S.T.C. 2499 of 2016. The witness testified regarding an alleged Tamilar symbol drawn on a school wall during the 2016 elections, stating he did not directly know who drew it and could not confirm details about the accused's involvement. During cross-examination, the witness acknowledged that while a symbol was present on the wall, the accused's name was not specifically mentioned, and his testimony does not establish the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case