Cr.No.134/16, Keeranur P.S. vs Neenbar — 2499/2016

Case under --- Section 4(1)tnoppd. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNDG090020282016

Filing Number

2499/2016

Filing Date

18-Oct-2016

Registration No

2499/2016

Registration Date

18-Oct-2016

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palani

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

134

Police Station

Keeranur P.S.

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

--- Section 4(1)tnoppd
Indian Penal Code Section 188

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Cr.No.134/16, Keeranur P.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Neenbar

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 14-May-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 12-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 23-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 17-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 09-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 20-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 04-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 03-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 03-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 02-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 27-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 21-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 18-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 06-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 08-Jan-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 21-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 07-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 15-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 01-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 09-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 21-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 14-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 06-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 02-Jul-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 06-Jun-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 13-May-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 23-Apr-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 08-Apr-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 21-Mar-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  37. 06-Mar-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  38. 19-Feb-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  39. 03-Feb-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  40. 08-Jan-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  41. 14-Dec-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  42. 23-Nov-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  43. 09-Nov-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  44. 18-Oct-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  45. 05-Oct-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  46. 14-Sep-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  47. 04-Sep-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  48. 21-Aug-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  49. 09-Aug-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  50. 24-Jul-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  51. 18-Jul-2023

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary: This is a witness deposition (P.W.2) recorded on 18.07.2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Palani in case S.T.C. 2499 of 2016. The witness testified regarding an alleged Tamilar symbol drawn on a school wall during the 2016 elections, stating he did not directly know who drew it and could not confirm details about the accused's involvement. During cross-examination, the witness acknowledged that while a symbol was present on the wall, the accused's name was not specifically mentioned, and his testimony does not establish the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  52. 18-Jul-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  53. 06-Jul-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  54. 19-Jun-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  55. 07-Jun-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  56. 07-Jun-2023

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate

  57. 16-May-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  58. 08-May-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  59. 20-Apr-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  60. 12-Apr-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  61. 06-Apr-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  62. 16-Mar-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  63. 04-Mar-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  64. 08-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  65. 19-Jan-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  66. 03-Jan-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  67. 07-Dec-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  68. 16-Nov-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  69. 03-Nov-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  70. 13-Oct-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  71. 30-Sep-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  72. 01-Sep-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  73. 02-Aug-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  74. 14-Jul-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  75. 30-Jun-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  76. 17-May-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  77. 21-Mar-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  78. 21-Mar-2022

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  79. 28-Feb-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  80. 09-Feb-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  81. 22-Dec-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  82. 28-Oct-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  83. 06-Sep-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  84. 16-Jun-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  85. 22-Mar-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  86. 23-Dec-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  87. 25-Sep-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  88. 31-Jul-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  89. 04-May-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  90. 04-Mar-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  91. 09-Dec-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  92. 16-Sep-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  93. 19-Jun-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  94. 16-Apr-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  95. 19-Feb-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  96. 10-Dec-2018

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  97. 25-Sep-2018

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  98. 23-Jul-2018

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  99. 31-May-2018

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  100. 06-Mar-2018

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  101. 07-Dec-2017

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  102. 28-Sep-2017

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  103. 27-Jul-2017

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  104. 08-Jun-2017

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  105. 16-Mar-2017

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  106. 29-Dec-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  107. 18-Oct-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2499/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a witness deposition (P.W.2) recorded on 18.07.2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court in Palani in case S.T.C. 2499 of 2016. The witness testified regarding an alleged Tamilar symbol drawn on a school wall during the 2016 elections, stating he did not directly know who drew it and could not confirm details about the accused's involvement. During cross-examination, the witness acknowledged that while a symbol was present on the wall, the accused's name was not specifically mentioned, and his testimony does not establish the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case