The S.I of Police, Taluk PS vs Sakthivel Advocate - K.Viswa Barathi — 218/2026

Case under Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNDG090005572026

Filing Number

557/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

218/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Palani

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

118

Police Station

Taluk P.S. Palani

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),324(5),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The S.I of Police, Taluk PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sakthivel Advocate - K.Viswa Barathi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Palani Munsif Court rejected the bail petition filed by the accused, Saktivel, who was arrested on 07.03.2026 under TNPHW Act sections 4, 296(b), 324(5), and 351(3) BNS for allegedly assaulting a woman. The court found the charges cognizable and denied bail, considering the severity of the offense against the female victim and the risk of witness intimidation and case obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Await Records

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 218/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Palani Munsif Court rejected the bail petition filed by the accused, Saktivel, who was arrested on 07.03.2026 under TNPHW Act sections 4, 296(b), 324(5), and 351(3) BNS for allegedly assaulting a woman. The court found the charges cognizable and denied bail, considering the severity of the offense against the female victim and the risk of witness intimidation and case obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case