Thangaraj vs VVR Venkatachalam — 152/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section order7Rule1. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG080002082025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
03-12-2025
Filing Number
1033/2025
Filing Date
03-12-2025
Registration No
152/2025
Registration Date
03-12-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Palani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thangaraj
Adv. PERUMAL PALANI
Respondent(s)
VVR Venkatachalam
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Batta
Batta
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Written Statement |
| 10-04-2026 | Written Statement |
| 12-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 12-02-2026 | Batta |
| 23-01-2026 | Batta |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Commercial Court, Palani, granted the petition and issued a temporary injunction order on April 15, 2026. The court directed the respondents (Assistant Electrical Engineer and Engineer of Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Company) to restore electricity supply (Connection No. 282-006-1204) to the petitioner's residence, which was disconnected on December 5, 2025 without prior notice, until the final judgment in the main case is delivered. The court found that the petitioner established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored granting relief, and irreparable loss would result if the interim order was not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Commercial Court, Palani, granted the petition and issued a temporary injunction order on April 15, 2026. The court directed the respondents (Assistant Electrical Engineer and Engineer of Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Company) to restore electricity supply (Connection No. 282-006-1204) to the petitioner's residence, which was disconnected on December 5, 2025 without prior notice, until the final judgment in the main case is delivered. The court found that the petitioner established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored granting relief, and irreparable loss would result if the interim order was not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts