Pavithra vs Subramanian Advocate - C.Selvaraj — 120/2021
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG080001552021
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
242/2021
Filing Date
25-08-2021
Registration No
120/2021
Registration Date
28-09-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Palani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pavithra
Adv. M.Rajendrababu
Respondent(s)
Subramanian Advocate - C.Selvaraj
Thangamani
Adv. C.Selvaraj
Saravanakkumar
Adv. C.Selvaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 21-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 15-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 09-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 07-04-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a District Munsif Court order from Palani, dated 18.06.2024, in a property dispute case (A.V. No. 120/2021). The court conducted cross-examination of the witness and rejected several claims made by the plaintiff, finding them contradictory and unsupported by documentary evidence such as property tax receipts, utility bills, or family records. The court ruled that the case is not maintainable as filed and dismissed it with costs against the plaintiff, noting that the plaintiff filed a false claim based on property in which they have no legitimate possession or ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a District Munsif Court order from Palani, dated 18.06.2024, in a property dispute case (A.V. No. 120/2021). The court conducted cross-examination of the witness and rejected several claims made by the plaintiff, finding them contradictory and unsupported by documentary evidence such as property tax receipts, utility bills, or family records. The court ruled that the case is not maintainable as filed and dismissed it with costs against the plaintiff, noting that the plaintiff filed a false claim based on property in which they have no legitimate possession or ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts