A.Maamoondi vs T.Murugan Advocate - P.Mathiyalagan — 85/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG080001202023
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
120/2023
Filing Date
03-10-2023
Registration No
85/2023
Registration Date
03-10-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Palani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.Maamoondi
Adv. M.Manikannan
Respondent(s)
T.Murugan Advocate - P.Mathiyalagan
M.Pandiyan
Adv. P.Mathiyalagan
M.Subramani
Adv. P.Mathiyalagan
M.Periyasamy
Adv. P.Mathiyalagan
P.Guru
Adv. P.Mathiyalagan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Orders
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 23-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-03-2026 | Orders |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
| 20-02-2026 | Orders |
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed the petition (I.A. No. 3-2023) filed by the plaintiff seeking to add three women (proposed defendants 6, 7, 8) as necessary parties to the original suit (O.S. No. 85-2023) regarding Mamundi temple management. The District Court found insufficient evidence that these individuals were essential parties and held that the case could proceed to a final decision without them, making their inclusion unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the petition (I.A. No. 3-2023) filed by the plaintiff seeking to add three women (proposed defendants 6, 7, 8) as necessary parties to the original suit (O.S. No. 85-2023) regarding Mamundi temple management. The District Court found insufficient evidence that these individuals were essential parties and held that the case could proceed to a final decision without them, making their inclusion unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts