Kanagamparam vs K.Aruchamy Gounder Advocate - K.Boopathi — 106/2022
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 40. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG080001192022
Filing Number
164/2022
Filing Date
18-Oct-2022
Registration No
106/2022
Registration Date
18-Oct-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Palani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kanagamparam
Adv. S.Jeyaraman
Respondent(s)
-
1.K.Aruchamy Gounder Advocate - K.Boopathi
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
07-Apr-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
18-Mar-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary: In I.A. 1043/2015 before the District Munsif Court, Palani, the witness (Court Commissioner D.W-1) was recalled on 09.03.2026 for cross-examination. The court permitted the plaintiff to cross-examine the court commissioner regarding the survey and inspection report, particularly regarding Survey No. 107/6 where modifications were made. The court found that the commissioner's inspection and report were conducted in accordance with proper procedures and dismissed the cross-examination objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
16-Feb-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
10-Feb-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
03-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
19-Aug-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
05-Aug-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
16-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
07-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
26-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
06-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
24-Apr-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
20-Mar-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
18-Feb-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
22-Jan-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
16-Dec-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
04-Dec-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
22-Nov-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
24-Oct-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
03-Oct-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
13-Sep-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
27-Aug-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
30-Jul-2024
Mediation
District Munsif
-
15-Jul-2024
Mediation
District Munsif
-
01-Jul-2024
Mediation
District Munsif
-
19-Jun-2024
Mediation
District Munsif
-
26-Apr-2024
Mediation
District Munsif
-
05-Apr-2024
Mediation
District Munsif
-
08-Mar-2024
Mediation
District Munsif
-
21-Feb-2024
Mediation
District Munsif
-
18-Jan-2024
Mediation
District Munsif
-
21-Dec-2023
Mediation
District Munsif
-
16-Nov-2023
Await Reports
District Munsif
-
30-Oct-2023
Await Reports
District Munsif
-
13-Oct-2023
Await Reports
District Munsif
-
07-Sep-2023
Await Reports
District Munsif
-
18-Aug-2023
Await Records
District Munsif
-
17-Jul-2023
Await Records
District Munsif
-
07-Jul-2023
Mediation
District Munsif
-
28-Jun-2023
Mediation
District Munsif
-
15-Jun-2023
Mediation
District Munsif
-
01-Jun-2023
Mediation
District Munsif
-
20-Apr-2023
Mediation
District Munsif
-
10-Apr-2023
Mediation
District Munsif
-
10-Mar-2023
Mediation
District Munsif
-
04-Mar-2023
Appearance
District Munsif
-
02-Mar-2023
Issues
District Munsif
-
16-Feb-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
19-Jan-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
18-Nov-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
18-Oct-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 106/2022
Summary: In I.A. 1043/2015 before the District Munsif Court, Palani, the witness (Court Commissioner D.W-1) was recalled on 09.03.2026 for cross-examination. The court permitted the plaintiff to cross-examine the court commissioner regarding the survey and inspection report, particularly regarding Survey No. 107/6 where modifications were made. The court found that the commissioner's inspection and report were conducted in accordance with proper procedures and dismissed the cross-examination objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts