KAM Paneerselvam vs Velumani — 1/2025

Case under The Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 Section 21(2)(a)(b)(e). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

RLTOP - Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlord and Tenant Original Petition

CNR: TNDG080001152025

e-Filing Number

02-07-2025

Filing Number

341/2025

Filing Date

04-Jul-2025

Registration No

1/2025

Registration Date

07-Jul-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Palani

Judge

2-District Munsif

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 Section 21(2)(a)(b)(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAM Paneerselvam

    Adv. Narmadha N

  2. 2.Elangovan

    Adv. Narmadha N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Velumani

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Court Order Summary District Rent Control Court, Palani (Case No. R.L.T.O.P. 2/2025) The witness (shop tenant) testified regarding rental payment disputes with the building management. The witness confirmed paying the revised rent of ₹8,250/month by various modes (cheques and NEFT transfers on dates 13.02.2025, 16.04.2025, and 30.05.2025) and stated he has operated his shop for 40 years without formal written agreements. No cross-examination was conducted by the opposing party. The case involves a rent control matter between the tenant and the building's management committee regarding rental obligations and shop possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  7. 01-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  12. 03-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  13. 25-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  14. 23-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  15. 12-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    District Munsif

  16. 04-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  18. 02-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  19. 02-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  20. 02-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  21. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  22. 23-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  23. 23-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  24. 23-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  25. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  26. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  27. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  28. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  29. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  30. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  31. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  32. 17-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  33. 07-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  34. 11-Sep-2025

    Counter

    District Munsif

  35. 21-Aug-2025

    Counter

    District Munsif

  36. 07-Aug-2025

    Counter

    District Munsif

  37. 07-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 04-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary District Rent Control Court, Palani (Case No. R.L.T.O.P. 2/2025) The witness (shop tenant) testified regarding rental payment disputes with the building management. The witness confirmed paying the revised rent of ₹8,250/month by various modes (cheques and NEFT transfers on dates 13.02.2025, 16.04.2025, and 30.05.2025) and stated he has operated his shop for 40 years without formal written agreements. No cross-examination was conducted by the opposing party. The case involves a rent control matter between the tenant and the building's management committee regarding rental obligations and shop possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case