Jeyalakshmi vs Palanisamy — 73/2024

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(d),27(c). Status: Issues. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 01-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG080000952024

Filing Number

94/2024

Filing Date

16-Aug-2024

Registration No

73/2024

Registration Date

16-Aug-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Palani

Judge

2-District Munsif

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(d),27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jeyalakshmi

    Adv. V.Rajamanickam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Palanisamy

  2. 2.Rajamani

  3. 3.President, Chinnakalayamputhur Panchayat

  4. 4.District Collector, Dindigul.

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  8. 26-Nov-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  9. 12-Nov-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  10. 25-Oct-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  11. 09-Oct-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  12. 16-Sep-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  13. 26-Aug-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  14. 28-Jul-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  15. 24-Jul-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  16. 14-Jul-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  17. 09-Jul-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  18. 02-Jul-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  19. 23-Jun-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  20. 16-Jun-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  21. 15-Apr-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  22. 15-Apr-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The District Commercial Court in Palani allowed the petition filed by Lakshmi regarding a property dispute. The court appointed an advocate commissioner (P. Navas Charif) with a fee of Rs. 7,000 to survey the suit property, measure it with the help of village revenue official and surveyor, and submit a detailed report with map by June 16, 2025, to determine the exact boundaries and identify any encroachment by the first defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 15-Apr-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  24. 01-Apr-2025

    Orders

    District Munsif

  25. 28-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  26. 21-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  27. 07-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  28. 26-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  29. 28-Jan-2025

    Counter

    District Munsif

  30. 18-Dec-2024

    Counter

    District Munsif

  31. 25-Nov-2024

    Issue of Process

    District Munsif

  32. 25-Oct-2024

    Issue of Process

    District Munsif

  33. 16-Oct-2024

    Issue of Process

    District Munsif

  34. 21-Sep-2024

    Issue of Process

    District Munsif

  35. 17-Sep-2024

    Issue of Process

    District Munsif

  36. 16-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 16-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 73/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Commercial Court in Palani allowed the petition filed by Lakshmi regarding a property dispute. The court appointed an advocate commissioner (P. Navas Charif) with a fee of Rs. 7,000 to survey the suit property, measure it with the help of village revenue official and surveyor, and submit a detailed report with map by June 16, 2025, to determine the exact boundaries and identify any encroachment by the first defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case