Veluchamy Gounder vs K.Chinnaraj alias Palanisamy died and five others — 308/2007
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or.26,Rule13,14andSec.151CPC. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
IA - Interlocutary Application
CNR: TNDG080000822007
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Date
16-03-2007
Registration No
308/2007
Registration Date
16-03-2007
Court
District Munsif Court, Palani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Veluchamy Gounder
Respondent(s)
K.Chinnaraj alias Palanisamy died and five others
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 17-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 17-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary The court (dated 02.02.2019) dismissed the petition filed under CrPC Section 401. The court found that the petitioner failed to prove the charges against the police officer and that the officer's actions were justified. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments regarding improper investigation and procedural violations, concluding there was insufficient evidence to support the claims made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court (dated 02.02.2019) dismissed the petition filed under CrPC Section 401. The court found that the petitioner failed to prove the charges against the police officer and that the officer's actions were justified. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments regarding improper investigation and procedural violations, concluding there was insufficient evidence to support the claims made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts