Thangamuthu vs Rathinakumar Advocate - T.Elango — 53/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b),27(c). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG080000782023
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
78/2023
Filing Date
28-06-2023
Registration No
53/2023
Registration Date
28-06-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Palani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thangamuthu
Adv. C.Ramamoorthi
Respondent(s)
Rathinakumar Advocate - T.Elango
Muthukumar
Adv. T.Elango
The Tahsildar, Palani.
Adv. Government Pleader
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani.
Adv. Government Pleader
The District Collector, Dindigul.
Adv. Government Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 20-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 15-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 08-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgement |
Interim Orders
The court order documents cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness on 18.10.2024 in case A.V. No. 53/2023 before the Madurai District Civil Court. The court rejected the witness's testimony as inadmissible, noting that the witness claimed lack of knowledge about property details, plot numbers, dimensions, and case particulars, yet still provided biased testimony in favor of defendants 1 and 2, which was improper and unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court order documents cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness on 18.10.2024 in case A.V. No. 53/2023 before the Madurai District Civil Court. The court rejected the witness's testimony as inadmissible, noting that the witness claimed lack of knowledge about property details, plot numbers, dimensions, and case particulars, yet still provided biased testimony in favor of defendants 1 and 2, which was improper and unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts