Ellammal vs State through the District Collector, Dindigul Advocate - Government Pleader — 35/2024
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(d). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG080000412024
Filing Number
41/2024
Filing Date
12-Mar-2024
Registration No
35/2024
Registration Date
18-Mar-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Palani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ellammal
Adv. G.Sabitha
-
2.Manjula
-
3.Sarathamani
-
4.Indirani
-
5.Vanitha
-
6.Amsaveni
-
7.Radhakrishnan
-
8.Renuga
-
9.Revathi
Respondent(s)
-
1.State through the District Collector, Dindigul Advocate - Government Pleader
-
2.The Tahsildar, Palani
Adv. Government Pleader
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Judgement
District Munsif
-
12-Jun-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
04-Jun-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
01-Jun-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: 35/2024 On 01.06.2026, witness examination proceeded before the District Munsif Court, Palani. The witness testified that he has resided at the stated address for approximately 30 years and served as a village council chairman from 2020-2025. He clarified that the petitioners are family relatives and stated he would not provide false testimony in their favor despite family ties. Cross-examination was declined. The proceeding was recorded and read over to the witness in Tamil for acknowledgment as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
09-Apr-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
02-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
16-Mar-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
03-Mar-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
13-Feb-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
22-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
03-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
11-Jun-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
16-Apr-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
01-Apr-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
01-Apr-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
28-Feb-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
21-Feb-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
07-Feb-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
07-Feb-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
10-Jan-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
07-Jan-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
03-Dec-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
08-Nov-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
18-Oct-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
04-Oct-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
09-Sep-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
16-Aug-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
31-Jul-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
12-Jul-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
28-Jun-2024
Issues
District Munsif
-
24-Jun-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
10-Jun-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
22-Apr-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
18-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 35/2024
Case Summary: 35/2024 On 01.06.2026, witness examination proceeded before the District Munsif Court, Palani. The witness testified that he has resided at the stated address for approximately 30 years and served as a village council chairman from 2020-2025. He clarified that the petitioners are family relatives and stated he would not provide false testimony in their favor despite family ties. Cross-examination was declined. The proceeding was recorded and read over to the witness in Tamil for acknowledgment as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts