Illathu Pillaimar Mandapam through its Secretary Somasundaram vs Jeyakrishnan — 15/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Withdrawn on 27th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG080000152026
Filing Number
18/2026
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
15/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
District Munsif Court, Palani
Judge
2-District Munsif
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Withdrawn
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Illathu Pillaimar Mandapam through its Secretary Somasundaram
Adv. Thenmozhi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jeyakrishnan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The District Commercial Court in Palani granted a petition allowing the plaintiff (Somasundaram) to withdraw the suit and file a fresh suit with the same cause of action seeking a permanent injunction against the defendant. The court found that a formal defect existed in the original petition regarding missing property details and permitted withdrawal, relying on the principle that courts must ensure such withdrawals are not abused while considering the interests of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Munsif
-
10-Apr-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
30-Mar-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
26-Mar-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
17-Mar-2026
Appearance
District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2026
Appearance
District Munsif
-
09-Mar-2026
Appearance
District Munsif
-
05-Mar-2026
Appearance
District Munsif
-
05-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2026
Summary The District Commercial Court in Palani granted a petition allowing the plaintiff (Somasundaram) to withdraw the suit and file a fresh suit with the same cause of action seeking a permanent injunction against the defendant. The court found that a formal defect existed in the original petition regarding missing property details and permitted withdrawal, relying on the principle that courts must ensure such withdrawals are not abused while considering the interests of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts