Mohammed Ali vs Veluchamy — 395/2022

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 42(a), 22, 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG070010122022

Filing Number

995/2022

Filing Date

15-Nov-2022

Registration No

395/2022

Registration Date

15-Nov-2022

Court

Sub Court, Palani

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed with cost

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 42(a), 22, 27(c)
Ia/1/2022 Classification : Os Section Mohammed AliVeluchamy

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohammed Ali

    Adv. M.B.Abdul Nazar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Veluchamy

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's claim for specific performance of a property sale agreement, finding it was actually a loan transaction disguised as a sale. The court reasoned that an unusually long three-year payment period for a minimal Rs. 25,000 out of Rs. 2,25,000 total consideration, combined with the defendant's failure to pay interest and the history of multiple cancelled agreements, indicated the true nature was a secured loan rather than a genuine property sale. Instead, the court decreed the alternative relief: the defendant must repay Rs. 2,25,000 with 6% interest within one month, with a charge created on the property as security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Sub Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Sub Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    List / Special List

    Principal Sub Judge

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Sub Judge

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal Sub Judge

  8. 04-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal Sub Judge

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal Sub Judge

  10. 10-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal Sub Judge

  11. 23-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Principal Sub Judge

  12. 25-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Principal Sub Judge

  13. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  14. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  15. 31-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  16. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  17. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  18. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  19. 26-Jun-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  20. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  21. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  22. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  23. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  24. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  25. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  26. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  27. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  28. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  29. 20-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  30. 05-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  31. 21-Sep-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Principal Sub Judge

  32. 12-Sep-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Principal Sub Judge

  33. 21-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  34. 24-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  35. 04-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  36. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  37. 24-Apr-2024

    BailView PDF

  38. 24-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  39. 15-Feb-2024

    Trial

    Principal Sub Judge

  40. 23-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Principal Sub Judge

  41. 24-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Principal Sub Judge

  42. 21-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal Sub Judge

  43. 06-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal Sub Judge

  44. 02-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal Sub Judge

  45. 03-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal Sub Judge

  46. 15-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 15-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 395/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's claim for specific performance of a property sale agreement, finding it was actually a loan transaction disguised as a sale. The court reasoned that an unusually long three-year payment period for a minimal Rs. 25,000 out of Rs. 2,25,000 total consideration, combined with the defendant's failure to pay interest and the history of multiple cancelled agreements, indicated the true nature was a secured loan rather than a genuine property sale. Instead, the court decreed the alternative relief: the defendant must repay Rs. 2,25,000 with 6% interest within one month, with a charge created on the property as security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case