M. Muniyandi vs S. Murugasamy — 172/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 18th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNDG070008332022
Filing Number
819/2022
Filing Date
16-Aug-2022
Registration No
172/2022
Registration Date
21-Sep-2022
Court
Sub Court, Palani
Judge
2-Additional Sub Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M. Muniyandi
Adv. N.Durai
Respondent(s)
-
1.S. Murugasamy
-
2.MAGMA HDI General Insurance Company LTD.,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional District Court (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) in Palani awarded compensation to two motor accident victims from a July 2022 collision. In Case 172/2022, the court ordered the insurance company to pay ₹15,41,692 to the first claimant for severe injuries including 49% permanent disability, medical expenses, and loss of earnings. In Case 174/2022, the second claimant received ₹48,899 for minor injuries and outpatient treatment. The court held the truck driver (TN 57 AR 9714) liable for rash and negligent driving, and ruled the insurance company must recover the payout from the driver since his vehicle's fitness certificate had expired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Sub Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Orders
Additional Sub Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders
Additional Sub Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
Additional Sub Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Orders
Additional Sub Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Orders
Additional Sub Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Orders
Additional Sub Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Orders
Additional Sub Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Arguments
Additional Sub Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Arguments
Additional Sub Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Arguments
Additional Sub Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Nov-2025
Arguments
Additional Sub Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
07-Apr-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
10-Mar-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
10-Feb-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
27-Jan-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
27-Jan-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
11-Nov-2024
Enquiry
Additional Sub Judge
-
01-Oct-2024
Enquiry
Additional Sub Judge
-
14-Sep-2024
Lok Adalat
Additional Sub Judge
-
12-Aug-2024
Lok Adalat
Additional Sub Judge
-
05-Aug-2024
Enquiry
Additional Sub Judge
-
01-Jul-2024
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
24-Jun-2024
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
22-Apr-2024
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
25-Mar-2024
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
26-Feb-2024
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
23-Jan-2024
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
13-Dec-2023
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
07-Nov-2023
Await Records
Additional Sub Judge
-
04-Sep-2023
Await Records
Additional Sub Judge
-
28-Aug-2023
Await Records
Additional Sub Judge
-
17-Jul-2023
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
26-Jun-2023
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
06-Apr-2023
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
03-Apr-2023
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
27-Feb-2023
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
09-Jan-2023
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
25-Nov-2022
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
07-Nov-2022
Counter
Additional Sub Judge
-
21-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 172/2022
Court Decision Summary The Additional District Court (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) in Palani awarded compensation to two motor accident victims from a July 2022 collision. In Case 172/2022, the court ordered the insurance company to pay ₹15,41,692 to the first claimant for severe injuries including 49% permanent disability, medical expenses, and loss of earnings. In Case 174/2022, the second claimant received ₹48,899 for minor injuries and outpatient treatment. The court held the truck driver (TN 57 AR 9714) liable for rash and negligent driving, and ruled the insurance company must recover the payout from the driver since his vehicle's fitness certificate had expired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts