Ramasamy vs Ganesan — 293/2018

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 42,22,27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG070006592018

Evidence

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

6099/2018

Filing Date

27-07-2018

Registration No

293/2018

Registration Date

27-07-2018

Court

Sub Court, Palani

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 42,22,27(c)
IA/1/2023 Classification : OS Section RamasamyGanesan
IA/2/2023 Classification : OS Section MeenakshiGanesan
IA/3/2024 Classification : OS Section MeenatchiGanesan
IA/4/2024 Classification : OS Section RamasamyGanesan

Petitioner(s)

Ramasamy

Adv. P.Ganesan

Respondent(s)

Ganesan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge

22-04-2026

Evidence

09-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

18-02-2026

Evidence

29-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary Case: O.S.No.293/2018, Palani Principal District Court Date: 12-03-2026 The court recorded cross-examination of the plaintiff witness regarding a mortgage deed dispute involving agricultural property (coconut grove). The court examined contested claims about whether the deed represented a genuine mortgage or was given as security for a Rs. 4 lakh loan, including disputes over property valuation, timeline conditions, and witness authenticity. The case proceeding involved detailed examination of the plaintiff's testimony on the nature and enforceability of the mortgage agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: O.S.No.293/2018, Palani Principal District Court Date: 12-03-2026 The court recorded cross-examination of the plaintiff witness regarding a mortgage deed dispute involving agricultural property (coconut grove). The court examined contested claims about whether the deed represented a genuine mortgage or was given as security for a Rs. 4 lakh loan, including disputes over property valuation, timeline conditions, and witness authenticity. The case proceeding involved detailed examination of the plaintiff's testimony on the nature and enforceability of the mortgage agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Palani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case