Vikaram vs Nageswaran — 173/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/s 25 b. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 04-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG070006332025

Filing Number

854/2025

Filing Date

11-Aug-2025

Registration No

173/2025

Registration Date

13-Aug-2025

Court

Sub Court, Palani

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section u/s 25 b

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vikaram

    Adv. H. Shahul Hameed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nageswaran

  2. 2.Lakshmi

  3. 3.Soumya

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In O.S. No. 173/2025 before the Principal District Court, Palani, the plaintiff Mr. Vikram (Witness 1) testified on January 22, 2026 under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming that the written statement was prepared based on his information and that the signatures are authentic. The first hearing has been adjourned at the counsel's request to allow for marking/coding of exhibits, with further proceedings to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Sub Judge

  8. 12-Sep-2025

    Batta

    Principal Sub Judge

  9. 13-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 173/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In O.S. No. 173/2025 before the Principal District Court, Palani, the plaintiff Mr. Vikram (Witness 1) testified on January 22, 2026 under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming that the written statement was prepared based on his information and that the signatures are authentic. The first hearing has been adjourned at the counsel's request to allow for marking/coding of exhibits, with further proceedings to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case