S.Karupusamy vs Duraisamy and 2 others — 144/2024
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 42(a) or 22. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 10th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG070005692024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
495/2024
Filing Date
24-01-2017
Registration No
144/2024
Registration Date
24-01-2017
Court
Sub Court, Palani
Judge
2-Additional Sub Judge
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.Karupusamy
Adv. P.MAHENDRAN
Respondent(s)
Duraisamy and 2 others
Rajmohan
Sanjit Rahul
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Sub Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Judgment The Additional Munsif Court, Palaní (Tamil Nadu) rejected the plaintiff's claim for specific performance of a sale agreement regarding property valued at ₹7,00,000. The court found that the sale agreement was executed as security for a loan transaction rather than a genuine property sale, as evidenced by the defendants' consistent pattern of executing similar mortgaged agreements with multiple creditors between 2011-2015. Instead of granting specific performance, the court awarded alternative relief of ₹5,00,000 to be paid by defendants with 9% annual interest until judgment date and 6% thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Judgment The Additional Munsif Court, Palaní (Tamil Nadu) rejected the plaintiff's claim for specific performance of a sale agreement regarding property valued at ₹7,00,000. The court found that the sale agreement was executed as security for a loan transaction rather than a genuine property sale, as evidenced by the defendants' consistent pattern of executing similar mortgaged agreements with multiple creditors between 2011-2015. Instead of granting specific performance, the court awarded alternative relief of ₹5,00,000 to be paid by defendants with 9% annual interest until judgment date and 6% thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts