S.Karupusamy vs Duraisamy and 2 others — 144/2024
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 42(a) or 22. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 10th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG070005692024
Filing Number
495/2024
Filing Date
24-Jan-2017
Registration No
144/2024
Registration Date
24-Jan-2017
Court
Sub Court, Palani
Judge
2-Additional Sub Judge
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.Karupusamy
Adv. P.MAHENDRAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Duraisamy and 2 others
-
2.Rajmohan
-
3.Sanjit Rahul
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Court Judgment The Additional Munsif Court, Palaní (Tamil Nadu) rejected the plaintiff's claim for specific performance of a sale agreement regarding property valued at ₹7,00,000. The court found that the sale agreement was executed as security for a loan transaction rather than a genuine property sale, as evidenced by the defendants' consistent pattern of executing similar mortgaged agreements with multiple creditors between 2011-2015. Instead of granting specific performance, the court awarded alternative relief of ₹5,00,000 to be paid by defendants with 9% annual interest until judgment date and 6% thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional Sub Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Judgement
Additional Sub Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Judgement
Additional Sub Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
Additional Sub Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
Additional Sub Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional Sub Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
IA Pending
Additional Sub Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
IA Pending
Additional Sub Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
IA Pending
Additional Sub Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Additional Sub Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Additional Sub Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Additional Sub Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Additional Sub Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Arguments
Additional Sub Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Arguments
Additional Sub Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Arguments
Additional Sub Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
20-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Additional Sub Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Additional Sub Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Additional Sub Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Additional Sub Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Additional Sub Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Arguments
Additional Sub Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
For further Proceedings
Additional Sub Judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Additional Sub Judge
-
03-Jun-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Additional Sub Judge
-
26-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Additional Sub Judge
-
05-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Additional Sub Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Additional Sub Judge
-
28-Nov-2024
Issue of Process
Additional Sub Judge
-
30-Oct-2024
Issue of Process
Additional Sub Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Batta
Additional Sub Judge
-
22-Aug-2024
Batta
Additional Sub Judge
-
25-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jan-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 144/2024
Summary of Court Judgment The Additional Munsif Court, Palaní (Tamil Nadu) rejected the plaintiff's claim for specific performance of a sale agreement regarding property valued at ₹7,00,000. The court found that the sale agreement was executed as security for a loan transaction rather than a genuine property sale, as evidenced by the defendants' consistent pattern of executing similar mortgaged agreements with multiple creditors between 2011-2015. Instead of granting specific performance, the court awarded alternative relief of ₹5,00,000 to be paid by defendants with 9% annual interest until judgment date and 6% thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts