Prasath vs Ravi — 231/2018

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 33. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG070005602018

Arguments

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

5015/2018

Filing Date

28-06-2018

Registration No

231/2018

Registration Date

28-06-2018

Court

Sub Court, Palani

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 33

Petitioner(s)

Prasath

Adv. S.Rjeshkanan

Respondent(s)

Ravi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge

29-04-2026

Arguments

08-04-2026

Arguments

25-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

19-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

06-01-2023
Bail
04-08-2023
Bail
08-03-2024
Bail
08-04-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: In O.S. No. 231/2018 from the Principal District Court, Palani (dated 08-04-2026), the witness was recalled and cross-examined by the plaintiff's counsel regarding a monetary transaction. The witness testified that the defendant received Rs. 4 lakhs from the plaintiff on 14.11.2016 and repaid Rs. 2 lakhs, but denied knowledge of any formal agreement or loan deed between the parties. The court found the witness's testimony unreliable and ruled that the plaintiff failed to establish sufficient evidence to support his claim, thereby dismissing the petition without granting relief to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In O.S. No. 231/2018 from the Principal District Court, Palani (dated 08-04-2026), the witness was recalled and cross-examined by the plaintiff's counsel regarding a monetary transaction. The witness testified that the defendant received Rs. 4 lakhs from the plaintiff on 14.11.2016 and repaid Rs. 2 lakhs, but denied knowledge of any formal agreement or loan deed between the parties. The court found the witness's testimony unreliable and ruled that the plaintiff failed to establish sufficient evidence to support his claim, thereby dismissing the petition without granting relief to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Palani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case