K.Subbulakshmi and 7 others vs Shanmugam and 5 others — 389/2014

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2). Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG070004992014

For further Proceedings

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Date

07-10-2014

Registration No

389/2014

Registration Date

07-10-2014

Court

Sub Court, Palani

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 37(2)
IA/1/2022 Classification : OS Section K.Subbulakshmi and 7 othersShanmugam and 5 others
IA/2/2023 Classification : 151 Petition Section K.Subbulakshmi and 7 othersShanmugam and 5 others

Petitioner(s)

K.Subbulakshmi and 7 others

Respondent(s)

Shanmugam and 5 others

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge

18-04-2026

For further Proceedings

08-04-2026

For further Proceedings

23-03-2026

For further Proceedings

12-03-2026

List / Special List

19-02-2026

List / Special List

Interim Orders

20-10-2021
Bail
29-11-2021
Bail
23-12-2021
Bail
09-02-2022
Bail
05-04-2022
Bail
21-04-2022
Bail
26-04-2022
Bail
08-06-2022
Bail
22-06-2022
Bail
21-06-2023
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The petition filed by the plaintiffs under Order I Rule 10(2) and Section 151 of CPC to implead respondents 7 to 11 as defendants in the property partition suit (O.S. No.389/2014) was allowed on 21st June 2023. The court held that since the proposed parties have a share in the suit properties, they are necessary parties to the comprehensive partition suit and must be impleaded to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure complete resolution of the dispute. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by the plaintiffs under Order I Rule 10(2) and Section 151 of CPC to implead respondents 7 to 11 as defendants in the property partition suit (O.S. No.389/2014) was allowed on 21st June 2023. The court held that since the proposed parties have a share in the suit properties, they are necessary parties to the comprehensive partition suit and must be impleaded to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure complete resolution of the dispute. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Palani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case