Thirumalaisamy vs Marimuthu — 163/2022

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22,. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG070004562022

Part Heard

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

445/2022

Filing Date

07-06-2022

Registration No

163/2022

Registration Date

07-06-2022

Court

Sub Court, Palani

Judge

2-Additional Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 22,

Petitioner(s)

Thirumalaisamy

Adv. P.Ganesan

Respondent(s)

Marimuthu

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional Sub Judge

20-04-2026

Part Heard

01-04-2026

Part Heard

12-03-2026

Part Heard

05-03-2026

Part Heard

25-02-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

05-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

This is a civil money recovery case before the Additional Sub Judge Court, Palani (Case No. 163/2022, dated 05.03.2026). The court order records the cross-examination of the defendant (P. Va. Sa. 1 - Marimuthu) by the plaintiff's counsel, wherein the defendant denies borrowing money personally from the plaintiff, claiming he borrowed from a finance institution and repaid it. The defendant contests the plaintiff's allegations regarding incomplete documents and promissory notes, asserting that he has no obligation to repay any personal loan to the plaintiff since any institutional debt was already settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a civil money recovery case before the Additional Sub Judge Court, Palani (Case No. 163/2022, dated 05.03.2026). The court order records the cross-examination of the defendant (P. Va. Sa. 1 - Marimuthu) by the plaintiff's counsel, wherein the defendant denies borrowing money personally from the plaintiff, claiming he borrowed from a finance institution and repaid it. The defendant contests the plaintiff's allegations regarding incomplete documents and promissory notes, asserting that he has no obligation to repay any personal loan to the plaintiff since any institutional debt was already settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Palani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case