Shiek Abdullah vs Kallalaiyan pothu madam — 14/2024

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

AS - Appeal Suit

CNR: TNDG070003902024

IA Pending

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

346/2024

Filing Date

29-04-2024

Registration No

14/2024

Registration Date

04-06-2024

Court

Sub Court, Palani

Judge

2-Additional Sub Judge

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 27(c)
IA/1/2024 Classification : AS Section Shiek AbdullahKallalaiyan pothu madam
IA/2/2024 Classification : AS Section Shiek Abdullah
IA/3/2024 Classification : AS Section Shiek Abdullah

Petitioner(s)

Shiek Abdullah

Adv. M.Kalidoss

Respondent(s)

Kallalaiyan pothu madam

Nagarajan

Marimuthu

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional Sub Judge

12-03-2026

IA Pending

19-02-2026

IA Pending

18-02-2026

IA Pending

09-02-2026

IA Pending

07-02-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

08-09-2025
Copy of Order

SUMMARY: The Additional Subordinate Court in Palani dismissed the interim petition filed by the appellant/petitioner (Mesak Abdul) dated August 8, 2025. The court rejected the plea for an interim injunction order to prevent the respondents from interfering with the petitioner's occupation of a temple property (Kallayaan Savalayar Matam) in Palani while the main appeal was pending. The court held that such interim relief should not be granted before hearing both parties comprehensively on the merits of the underlying appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Additional Subordinate Court in Palani dismissed the interim petition filed by the appellant/petitioner (Mesak Abdul) dated August 8, 2025. The court rejected the plea for an interim injunction order to prevent the respondents from interfering with the petitioner's occupation of a temple property (Kallayaan Savalayar Matam) in Palani while the main appeal was pending. The court held that such interim relief should not be granted before hearing both parties comprehensively on the merits of the underlying appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Palani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case