V. Rupa vs V. Elangovan and Others — 93/2021
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section Sec 27 c, 37(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG070002952021
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
335/2021
Filing Date
04-03-2021
Registration No
93/2021
Registration Date
04-03-2021
Court
Sub Court, Palani
Judge
1-Principal Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V. Rupa
Adv. P. Nagulsamy
Respondent(s)
V. Elangovan and Others
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 29-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary O.S. No. 93/2021 | District Court, Palani | Date: 12-11-2025 The witness was recalled and cross-examined by the plaintiff's counsel. During cross-examination, the witness testified regarding property rights, admitting that both the plaintiff and first defendant have rights to the property, while the second defendant (as Rajamani's heir) does not. The witness further clarified that the plaintiff received ₹3.5 lakh from the first defendant but no document was issued, and recanted his earlier statement by testifying that he falsely stated the plaintiff gave a document to the first defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary O.S. No. 93/2021 | District Court, Palani | Date: 12-11-2025 The witness was recalled and cross-examined by the plaintiff's counsel. During cross-examination, the witness testified regarding property rights, admitting that both the plaintiff and first defendant have rights to the property, while the second defendant (as Rajamani's heir) does not. The witness further clarified that the plaintiff received ₹3.5 lakh from the first defendant but no document was issued, and recanted his earlier statement by testifying that he falsely stated the plaintiff gave a document to the first defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts