Chinnasamy and 4 Others vs Kirishnana @ Ramakirishnan and 2 Others Advocate - T.Elengo — 10/2020

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section O 41, R 1. Status: Stay. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Stay Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

AS - Appeal Suit

CNR: TNDG070002182020

Filing Number

237/2020

Filing Date

20-Feb-2020

Registration No

10/2020

Registration Date

24-Feb-2020

Court

Sub Court, Palani

Judge

2-Additional Sub Judge

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section O 41, R 1
Ia/1/2022 Classification : as Section Chinnasamy and 4 OthersKirishnana @ Ramakirishnan and 2 Others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chinnasamy and 4 Others

    Adv. Eteeshwaran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kirishnana @ Ramakirishnan and 2 Others Advocate - T.Elengo

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Stay

    Additional Sub Judge

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  6. 20-Nov-2025

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  7. 31-Oct-2025

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  8. 10-Oct-2025

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  10. 26-Aug-2025

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  11. 22-Jul-2025

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  12. 01-Jul-2025

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  13. 03-Jun-2025

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  14. 18-Mar-2025

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  15. 27-Feb-2025

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  16. 06-Feb-2025

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  17. 11-Dec-2024

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  18. 14-Nov-2024

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  19. 15-Oct-2024

    CRP Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  20. 13-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  21. 20-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  22. 01-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  23. 05-Jul-2024

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  24. 13-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  25. 15-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  26. 05-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  27. 07-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  28. 09-Jan-2024

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  29. 08-Dec-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  30. 10-Nov-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  31. 01-Nov-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  32. 11-Oct-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  33. 03-Oct-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  34. 15-Sep-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  35. 25-Aug-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  36. 03-Aug-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  37. 13-Jul-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  38. 06-Jul-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  39. 23-Jun-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  40. 20-Apr-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  41. 06-Apr-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  42. 02-Mar-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  43. 16-Feb-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  44. 02-Feb-2023

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The petition filed by five appellants under Rule 75 of the Civil Rules of Practice to summon revenue records (patta transfer files) from the Taluk Office, Palani, and mark them as additional evidence in their appeal was dismissed. The court found the petition devoid of merits because the petitioners failed to explain why they hadn't sought these documents during the trial, establish the necessity and relevancy of the documents, or demonstrate that they were unaware of them or unable to produce them despite due diligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  45. 02-Feb-2023

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  46. 19-Jan-2023

    Orders

    Additional Sub Judge

  47. 23-Dec-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  48. 15-Dec-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  49. 01-Dec-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  50. 24-Nov-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  51. 09-Nov-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  52. 15-Oct-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  53. 27-Sep-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  54. 26-Aug-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  55. 22-Jul-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  56. 05-Jul-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  57. 21-Jun-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  58. 13-Apr-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  59. 23-Mar-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  60. 22-Feb-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  61. 01-Feb-2022

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  62. 10-Dec-2021

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  63. 29-Oct-2021

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  64. 28-Sep-2021

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  65. 14-Sep-2021

    Arguments

    Additional Sub Judge

  66. 20-Jul-2021

    Appearance

    Additional Sub Judge

  67. 29-Apr-2021

    Appearance

    Additional Sub Judge

  68. 30-Mar-2021

    Appearance

    Additional Sub Judge

  69. 23-Mar-2021

    Appearance

    Additional Sub Judge

  70. 18-Mar-2021

    Appearance

    Additional Sub Judge

  71. 26-Feb-2021

    Service Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  72. 10-Feb-2021

    Service Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  73. 07-Jan-2021

    Service Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  74. 19-Nov-2020

    Service Pending

    Additional Sub Judge

  75. 20-Aug-2020

    Batta

    Additional Sub Judge

  76. 16-Apr-2020

    Batta

    Principal Sub Judge

  77. 26-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  78. 20-Feb-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition filed by five appellants under Rule 75 of the Civil Rules of Practice to summon revenue records (patta transfer files) from the Taluk Office, Palani, and mark them as additional evidence in their appeal was dismissed. The court found the petition devoid of merits because the petitioners failed to explain why they hadn't sought these documents during the trial, establish the necessity and relevancy of the documents, or demonstrate that they were unaware of them or unable to produce them despite due diligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case