Eshwari vs Ponnathal — 80/2022
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(1), 25(d), 27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG070001052022
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
104/2022
Filing Date
08-02-2022
Registration No
80/2022
Registration Date
23-03-2022
Court
Sub Court, Palani
Judge
2-Additional Sub Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Eshwari
Adv. S.Anvardeen
Respondent(s)
Ponnathal
Pavunathal
Adv. Thiru. V. Rajamanikam
Karuppuchamy
Vigneshkumar
Sarkunam
Prema
Kumarasamy
Rajendran
Adv. P.Chandrasekaran
Sivakumar
Adv. P.Chandrasekaran
Perumalsamy
Sivaraj
Thangavel
Hemalatha
Mahudeeswaran
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Sub Judge
IA Pending
IA Pending
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 10-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 12-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 04-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 18-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The petition filed by the plaintiff (Iswari) under CPC Order 6 Rule 17 and Section 151 seeking to amend the original suit by including two additional properties allegedly purchased from ancestral income has been dismissed. The court found that the amendment petition was filed with the intent to alter the fundamental basis of the case after both parties' evidence had concluded, and cited the Supreme Court precedent in *Basavaraj v. Indira* to hold that amendments changing the case's foundation post-evidence are not permissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The petition filed by the plaintiff (Iswari) under CPC Order 6 Rule 17 and Section 151 seeking to amend the original suit by including two additional properties allegedly purchased from ancestral income has been dismissed. The court found that the amendment petition was filed with the intent to alter the fundamental basis of the case after both parties' evidence had concluded, and cited the Supreme Court precedent in *Basavaraj v. Indira* to hold that amendments changing the case's foundation post-evidence are not permissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts