Town North P.S, Dindigul vs Thaarisuys Prabhu — 409/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNDG030781472024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

14-09-2024

Filing Number

7018783/2024

Filing Date

08-11-2024

Registration No

409/2024

Registration Date

08-11-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

24th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

835

Police Station

Dindigul Town North P.S

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 279,304(A)

Petitioner(s)

Town North P.S, Dindigul

Adv. Inspector of police town north police station

Respondent(s)

Thaarisuys Prabhu

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

24-04-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

Questioning

08-04-2026

Service Pending-Summon

27-03-2026

Service Pending-Summon

24-03-2026

Service Pending-Summon

Final Orders / Judgements

24-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: CC.No.409/2024 Court's Decision: The court acquitted the defendant (Tharcius Prabhu, age 20) of charges under IPC Sections 279 and 304(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found insufficient evidence that the defendant's rash or negligent driving directly caused the fatal accident that resulted in the victim's death on December 15, 2023. Key Reasoning: While the court acknowledged that an accident occurred and one person died, the eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and failed to establish that the defendant's alleged high-speed or negligent driving was the sole cause. The court applied the principle of "benefit of doubt," which must favor the accused when evidence is inconclusive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.409/2024 Court's Decision: The court acquitted the defendant (Tharcius Prabhu, age 20) of charges under IPC Sections 279 and 304(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found insufficient evidence that the defendant's rash or negligent driving directly caused the fatal accident that resulted in the victim's death on December 15, 2023. Key Reasoning: While the court acknowledged that an accident occurred and one person died, the eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and failed to establish that the defendant's alleged high-speed or negligent driving was the sole cause. The court applied the principle of "benefit of doubt," which must favor the accused when evidence is inconclusive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case