Town North P.S, Dindigul vs Thaarisuys Prabhu — 409/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG030781472024
e-Filing Number
14-09-2024
Filing Number
7018783/2024
Filing Date
08-11-2024
Registration No
409/2024
Registration Date
08-11-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
835
Police Station
Dindigul Town North P.S
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Town North P.S, Dindigul
Adv. Inspector of police town north police station
Respondent(s)
Thaarisuys Prabhu
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Questioning
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | Questioning |
| 08-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 27-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 24-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC.No.409/2024 Court's Decision: The court acquitted the defendant (Tharcius Prabhu, age 20) of charges under IPC Sections 279 and 304(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found insufficient evidence that the defendant's rash or negligent driving directly caused the fatal accident that resulted in the victim's death on December 15, 2023. Key Reasoning: While the court acknowledged that an accident occurred and one person died, the eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and failed to establish that the defendant's alleged high-speed or negligent driving was the sole cause. The court applied the principle of "benefit of doubt," which must favor the accused when evidence is inconclusive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC.No.409/2024 Court's Decision: The court acquitted the defendant (Tharcius Prabhu, age 20) of charges under IPC Sections 279 and 304(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court found insufficient evidence that the defendant's rash or negligent driving directly caused the fatal accident that resulted in the victim's death on December 15, 2023. Key Reasoning: While the court acknowledged that an accident occurred and one person died, the eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and failed to establish that the defendant's alleged high-speed or negligent driving was the sole cause. The court applied the principle of "benefit of doubt," which must favor the accused when evidence is inconclusive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts