Inspector of Police Town North PS vs Ravi @ Muttaikan Ravi — 122/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392r/w397,506(ii). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 20th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNDG030780802024
Filing Number
7018716/2024
Filing Date
16-08-2024
Registration No
122/2024
Registration Date
16-08-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
481
Police Station
Dindigul Town North P.S
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Town North PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Ravi @ Muttaikan Ravi
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 08-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 26-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 24-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Tirunelveli Sessions Court acquitted the accused Ravi (alias "Egg-eyed Ravi") on charges under IPC Sections 392/397 (dacoity) and 506(2) (criminal intimidation), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused, as key prosecution witnesses either couldn't identify the accused or claimed ignorance about the incident, making their testimonies unreliable in supporting the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Tirunelveli Sessions Court acquitted the accused Ravi (alias "Egg-eyed Ravi") on charges under IPC Sections 392/397 (dacoity) and 506(2) (criminal intimidation), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused, as key prosecution witnesses either couldn't identify the accused or claimed ignorance about the incident, making their testimonies unreliable in supporting the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts