Inspector of Police Town North PS vs Ravi @ Muttaikan Ravi — 122/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392r/w397,506(ii). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 20th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNDG030780802024
Filing Number
7018716/2024
Filing Date
16-Aug-2024
Registration No
122/2024
Registration Date
16-Aug-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
481
Police Station
Dindigul Town North P.S
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police Town North PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ravi @ Muttaikan Ravi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Tirunelveli Sessions Court acquitted the accused Ravi (alias "Egg-eyed Ravi") on charges under IPC Sections 392/397 (dacoity) and 506(2) (criminal intimidation), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused, as key prosecution witnesses either couldn't identify the accused or claimed ignorance about the incident, making their testimonies unreliable in supporting the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Apr-2026
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
20-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Nov-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Nov-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jun-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-May-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-May-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Apr-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jan-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Dec-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Dec-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Nov-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 122/2024
Court Decision Summary The Tirunelveli Sessions Court acquitted the accused Ravi (alias "Egg-eyed Ravi") on charges under IPC Sections 392/397 (dacoity) and 506(2) (criminal intimidation), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused, as key prosecution witnesses either couldn't identify the accused or claimed ignorance about the incident, making their testimonies unreliable in supporting the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts