Inspector of Police, Sanarpatti PS vs Muthumurugesan — 156/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392,397,323,506(2),34,120(B). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNDG030778672024

Filing Number

7018506/2024

Filing Date

16-Oct-2024

Registration No

156/2024

Registration Date

16-Oct-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

287

Police Station

Sanarpatty Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 392,397,323,506(2),34,120(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Sanarpatti PS (Police Station)

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Muthumurugesan

  2. 2.Vadivel

  3. 3.Sujatha

  4. 4.Sivaneshwaran

  5. 5.Manoj Kumar

  6. 6.Arunpandi

  7. 7.Anandh

  8. 8.Rabin

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: S.C. No. 156/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted all eight defendants of charges under IPC sections 392, 397, 323, 506(2), 120(B), and Section 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The complainant alleged that on 17.08.2023, eight defendants orchestrated a robbery and assault. The defendants allegedly threatened the complainant with knives, robbed money and mobile phones, and caused injuries. Despite police investigation and confessional statements from some accused, the trial court found insufficient credible evidence to establish guilt conclusively, noting inconsistencies in witness testimonies and gaps in the prosecution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Questioning

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 03-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  10. 03-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 03-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 18-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 10-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 24-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 04-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 15-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 08-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 17-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 09-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 19-Aug-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 06-Aug-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 29-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 22-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 10-Jul-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 25-Jun-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 11-Jun-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 04-Jun-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 21-May-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 07-May-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 23-Apr-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 09-Apr-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 27-Mar-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 11-Mar-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 26-Feb-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  37. 10-Feb-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  38. 27-Jan-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  39. 06-Jan-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  40. 13-Dec-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  41. 04-Dec-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  42. 21-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  43. 06-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  44. 05-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  45. 28-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 16-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 156/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C. No. 156/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted all eight defendants of charges under IPC sections 392, 397, 323, 506(2), 120(B), and Section 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The complainant alleged that on 17.08.2023, eight defendants orchestrated a robbery and assault. The defendants allegedly threatened the complainant with knives, robbed money and mobile phones, and caused injuries. Despite police investigation and confessional statements from some accused, the trial court found insufficient credible evidence to establish guilt conclusively, noting inconsistencies in witness testimonies and gaps in the prosecution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case