Inspector of police, Dindigul Town South PS vs Kumaresan — 150/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 399,402. Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNDG030778652024
Next Hearing
26th May 2026
Filing Number
7018505/2024
Filing Date
04-10-2024
Registration No
150/2024
Registration Date
04-10-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
463
Police Station
Dindigul Town South Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of police, Dindigul Town South PS (Police Station)
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Kumaresan
Raja @ Kappar raja
Sakthivel
Mani @ Abbachimani
Arul Gunaseviyar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 06-05-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 30-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 16-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 07-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition record (not a court order with a final ruling) in Case S.C. 150/2024 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul. The 5th prosecution witness, a 64-year-old retired special investigator, testified on 12.03.2026 regarding a 2016 patrol incident where he and colleagues apprehended suspects near Murugan Temple; during cross-examination by the accused, he clarified procedural details about the arrest and evidence collection. The witness's testimony was recorded under Section 4 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition record (not a court order with a final ruling) in Case S.C. 150/2024 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul. The 5th prosecution witness, a 64-year-old retired special investigator, testified on 12.03.2026 regarding a 2016 patrol incident where he and colleagues apprehended suspects near Murugan Temple; during cross-examination by the accused, he clarified procedural details about the arrest and evidence collection. The witness's testimony was recorded under Section 4 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts