Thadicombu Police Station, Dindigul vs Jawahar — 322/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A). Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.

Service Pending-Summon Next hearing 26-May-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNDG030741232024

e-Filing Number

29-08-2024

Filing Number

7014773/2024

Filing Date

03-Sep-2024

Registration No

322/2024

Registration Date

06-Sep-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

171

Police Station

Thadicombu P.S.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thadicombu Police Station, Dindigul

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jawahar

Case History

  1. 26-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: This is a witness deposition record (not a final court order) from CC.No. 322/2024 in the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul, dated 26.03.2026. The witness was cross-examined regarding a hit-and-run incident involving the witness's son. The witness testified about police investigation, hospital visits, CCTV evidence of a special car striking his son, and stated the accused drove recklessly—though he denied personal knowledge of CCTV footage and clarified the accused is not connected to this case. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 27-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 11-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  13. 11-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 03-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 22-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 07-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 17-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 04-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 25-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  20. 25-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 11-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  22. 11-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 04-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 14-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 30-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 25-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 15-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  28. 28-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  29. 05-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  30. 10-Feb-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  31. 08-Nov-2024

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  32. 06-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 03-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 322/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a witness deposition record (not a final court order) from CC.No. 322/2024 in the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul, dated 26.03.2026. The witness was cross-examined regarding a hit-and-run incident involving the witness's son. The witness testified about police investigation, hospital visits, CCTV evidence of a special car striking his son, and stated the accused drove recklessly—though he denied personal knowledge of CCTV footage and clarified the accused is not connected to this case. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case