Thadicombu Police Station, Dindigul vs Jawahar — 322/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A). Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNDG030741232024

Service Pending-Summon

Next Hearing

26th May 2026

e-Filing Number

29-08-2024

Filing Number

7014773/2024

Filing Date

03-09-2024

Registration No

322/2024

Registration Date

06-09-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

FIR Details

FIR Number

171

Police Station

Thadicombu P.S.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 279, 304(A)

Petitioner(s)

Thadicombu Police Station, Dindigul

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Jawahar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

29-04-2026

Service Pending-Summon

15-04-2026

Service Pending-Summon

10-04-2026

Service Pending-Summon

26-03-2026

Service Pending-Summon

12-03-2026

Service Pending-Summon

Interim Orders

26-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: This is a witness deposition record (not a final court order) from CC.No. 322/2024 in the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul, dated 26.03.2026. The witness was cross-examined regarding a hit-and-run incident involving the witness's son. The witness testified about police investigation, hospital visits, CCTV evidence of a special car striking his son, and stated the accused drove recklessly—though he denied personal knowledge of CCTV footage and clarified the accused is not connected to this case. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a witness deposition record (not a final court order) from CC.No. 322/2024 in the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul, dated 26.03.2026. The witness was cross-examined regarding a hit-and-run incident involving the witness's son. The witness testified about police investigation, hospital visits, CCTV evidence of a special car striking his son, and stated the accused drove recklessly—though he denied personal knowledge of CCTV footage and clarified the accused is not connected to this case. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case