Thadicombu Police Station, Dindigul vs Jawahar — 322/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A). Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG030741232024
Next Hearing
26th May 2026
e-Filing Number
29-08-2024
Filing Number
7014773/2024
Filing Date
03-09-2024
Registration No
322/2024
Registration Date
06-09-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
171
Police Station
Thadicombu P.S.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thadicombu Police Station, Dindigul
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Jawahar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 15-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 10-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 26-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 12-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition record (not a final court order) from CC.No. 322/2024 in the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul, dated 26.03.2026. The witness was cross-examined regarding a hit-and-run incident involving the witness's son. The witness testified about police investigation, hospital visits, CCTV evidence of a special car striking his son, and stated the accused drove recklessly—though he denied personal knowledge of CCTV footage and clarified the accused is not connected to this case. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition record (not a final court order) from CC.No. 322/2024 in the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul, dated 26.03.2026. The witness was cross-examined regarding a hit-and-run incident involving the witness's son. The witness testified about police investigation, hospital visits, CCTV evidence of a special car striking his son, and stated the accused drove recklessly—though he denied personal knowledge of CCTV footage and clarified the accused is not connected to this case. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts