Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk PS vs Naivettu @ Marrimuthu — 126/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),307,506(2),34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 29th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNDG030733582024
Filing Number
7014010/2024
Filing Date
16-08-2024
Registration No
126/2024
Registration Date
16-08-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
1003
Police Station
Dindigul Taluk P.S
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk PS (Police Station)
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Naivettu @ Marrimuthu
Bedi Bekkar alias Naga Arjun
Ammavasai alias Parthiban
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Questioning
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | Questioning |
| 16-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 07-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 18-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Tirunelveli Sessions Court acquitted three accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 341, 294(b), 307, and 506(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant inconsistencies and contradictions in witness testimonies—particularly between the injured victim and the treating doctor regarding how injuries were inflicted—and observed ambiguity about how many assailants were actually involved in the alleged assault that occurred on 18.08.2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Tirunelveli Sessions Court acquitted three accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 341, 294(b), 307, and 506(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant inconsistencies and contradictions in witness testimonies—particularly between the injured victim and the treating doctor regarding how injuries were inflicted—and observed ambiguity about how many assailants were actually involved in the alleged assault that occurred on 18.08.2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts